Started a draft response in my head and ended without publishing it because the post said it well enough, and a look at opalbazaar produced the same effect, content that satisfies my urge to add to it by being complete enough on its own is rare and represents a particular kind of editorial completeness here.

Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at pivotpeak extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.

Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at mavdrix reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.

Just sat with this for a bit longer than I usually would because the points are worth thinking about, and after balmbridge I had even more to chew on, the kind of post that nudges your thinking forward without forcing the issue is something I have always appreciated in good writing online.

Reading this back to back with a similar piece elsewhere made the quality difference obvious, and a stop at branchcrate only widened the gap, comparing content side by side is a useful exercise and the gap between this site and average competitors in the space is large enough to be noticeable from the first paragraph.